V. pleased with HP4
Friday, November 18th, 2005I just got back from seeing Harry Potter 4 with Christina and Ricky. Without spoiling it too much, I’d like to commend the most recent cinematic installment for its consistency and accuracy. The third movie deviated so much from the other two—for example, completely redesigning Hogwarts—and it showed little regard for the plot of the book. As a film alone, it was pleasant enough; but the third book, my favorite in the series, is infinitely better. The fourth movie did not quarrel with the directorial changes made in the third; it maintained stability for the viewers.
The fourth book is over three hundred pages longer than the third, and yet the new director managed to follow the written order (one of my biggest dislikes of the third movie concerns the placement of Harry’s receiving the Firebolt). Surprisingly, even the jokes thrown in were amusing. The only problem with it is that it is too rushed. What prevents Return of the King from being my favorite LotR film is the abundance of action without much story and character development. Battle scenes are connected by brief romantic and contemplative moments. HP4 bore much resemblance.
[Spoiler warning!]
The fourth movie moves from one event of the Triwizard Tournament to the next with almost nothing else in between. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the story suffered a bit at times in order to make all of the events believable and concise enough to fit into two hours and thirty minutes, but all of the modifications were tolerable and plausible. The kids are hardly ever seen in class; it seems the whole purpose of the year was for them to watch (or participate in) the tournament. The book takes a while to wade through because it is not one exciting scene of action following another. There are long, drawn-out parts about the house elves, and longer moments spent in the pensieve, and so many “boring” parts that make the really interesting stuff even better. That’s what this film needed. The audience would readily have watched the somewhat background plot—almost entirely cut from the film—in order to understand the characters and the school year better, not to mention (although I am mentioning it) the amount of drama that emerges in the fourth book that is only perhaps half present in the film.
These are very nitpicky criticisms. Usually I get extremely hung up on accuracy, so it’s really a big thing for me to think that a movie based on a book is good. This movie restored my faith in Harry Potter films. I recommend it to anyone who has read the book, or who will never read the book, without my usual “The book is much better” warning.